← All functions

POW

Unsupported (not recognized)

Category: Operator · Last tested 2026-09-01

Real compatibility results for the POW function: executed in Excel for the web, Google Sheets and LibreOffice Calc, measured against Google’s published documentation. Excel does not document POW, so this page makes no claim about Excel. Syntax and links to that documentation are below.

Support matrix

EngineDocumentedLive-testedVerdict
Excel (desktop)No n/a (not an Excel function) n/a
Excel for the web— Yes (recalc, 2026-09-01) Unsupported (not recognized)
Google SheetsYes Yes (Drive import, 2026-09-01) Supported, behaves as documented
LibreOffice CalcNo Yes (25.8.7.3, 2026-09-01) Unsupported (not recognized)

LibreOffice version history

We executed the same test cases under each LibreOffice release to show exactly when POW’s support changed — not documentation claims, real results.

LibreOffice versionVerdictTested
24.2.0.3 Unsupported (not recognized) 2026-09-01
24.8.7.2 Unsupported (not recognized) 2026-09-01
25.2.0.3 Unsupported (not recognized) 2026-09-01
25.8.7.3 Unsupported (not recognized) 2026-09-01

Why isn't POW working in LibreOffice?

LibreOffice Calc does not implement POW as of 25.8.7.3 — in our executed tests it returns a #NAME? (unrecognized function) error. This is not a typo or a settings problem, and saving the file as .xlsx does not change it: the function simply isn’t available yet. Watch the LibreOffice version support page — we re-run every test on each new release, so it will flip to Supported here as soon as it lands.

Discovered quirks

Executed test cases

Excel for the web (executed 2026-09-01 via OneDrive recalculation)

These values come from Excel for the web, not from desktop Excel. They are two different implementations of the calculation engine, and this run measured only the web one: the corpus was uploaded to OneDrive as .xlsx, recalculated by Excel for the web on open, and downloaded again for readback. Excel for the web is a rolling service with no pinnable version, so the run is identified by its date. Where a value here disagrees with the Expected column — which is Microsoft’s documentation of the desktop product — we cannot tell you whether the web engine diverges from the desktop one or the documentation is wrong about both, because we do not run desktop Excel.

FormulaDescriptionResultExpectedVerdict
=POW(4,0.5) The page's own Sample Usage line with a fractional exponent #NAME? 2
Provenance

Google's Sample Usage prints POW(4,0.5) with no result; 2 is DERIVED from the page's definition, "Returns a number raised to a power", i.e. the positive square root of 4. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603. BATCH PROVENANCE (batch H, the first Sheets/LibreOffice-only batch). Every function in this batch has x == false in docs/data/compat.json: it is a Google Sheets function that Microsoft does not document at all, so this corpus makes NO claim about it in that engine and nothing here is measured against that vendor's documentation. The authority is Google's own support.google.com function page, cited by full URL and by the date it was read -- Google publishes no version number for these pages, so a bare URL dates nothing. WHAT GOOGLE ACTUALLY PRINTS, WHICH IS LESS THAN IT LOOKS: most of these pages carry a 'Sample Usage' block of FORMULAS WITH NO RESULTS. Where a value below is Google's own published output the note says so; where it is derived from the page's stated semantics the note says that instead, and says from which sentence. No value in this batch was taken from a search snippet, a blog or a mirror. LIBREOFFICE: probed on all four pinned builds (24.2.0.3, 24.8.7.2, 25.2.0.3, 25.8.7.3) in five storage spellings -- plain, _xlfn., COM.MICROSOFT., ORG.OPENOFFICE. and _xlfn.ORG.OPENOFFICE. -- and #NAME? under every one of them, so the expected values below describe Google Sheets and the LibreOffice column records absence.

Mismatch
=POW(2,5) The page's other literal Sample Usage line #NAME? 32
Provenance

Derived from the same definition; the page publishes no results. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Mismatch
=POW(A2,B2) The page's cell-reference Sample Usage line #NAME? 81
Provenance

Derived; cells chosen by this corpus, since the page names A2/B2 without populating them. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Mismatch
=POW(2,5)-POWER(2,5) The documented equivalence to POWER, asserted structurally #NAME? 0
Provenance

A structural assertion with no derived constant. The page states "POW is equivalent to the POWER function." Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Mismatch
=POW(-3,3) The one constraint the page states, exercised on its permitted side #NAME? -27
Provenance

The `base` argument description is the page's only constraint: "If `base` is negative, `exponent` must be an integer." An integer exponent over a negative base is therefore the documented-legal case and -27 follows from the definition. The page names NO error value for the forbidden case (negative base, fractional exponent), so this corpus asserts nothing about it. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Mismatch

Google Sheets (executed 2026-09-01 via Drive import)

Google Sheets is a rolling service with no pinnable version, so this run is identified by its date. The corpus was imported to Drive as .xlsx, recalculated by Sheets, and exported back for readback.

FormulaDescriptionResultExpectedVerdict
=POW(4,0.5) The page's own Sample Usage line with a fractional exponent 2 2
Provenance

Google's Sample Usage prints POW(4,0.5) with no result; 2 is DERIVED from the page's definition, "Returns a number raised to a power", i.e. the positive square root of 4. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603. BATCH PROVENANCE (batch H, the first Sheets/LibreOffice-only batch). Every function in this batch has x == false in docs/data/compat.json: it is a Google Sheets function that Microsoft does not document at all, so this corpus makes NO claim about it in that engine and nothing here is measured against that vendor's documentation. The authority is Google's own support.google.com function page, cited by full URL and by the date it was read -- Google publishes no version number for these pages, so a bare URL dates nothing. WHAT GOOGLE ACTUALLY PRINTS, WHICH IS LESS THAN IT LOOKS: most of these pages carry a 'Sample Usage' block of FORMULAS WITH NO RESULTS. Where a value below is Google's own published output the note says so; where it is derived from the page's stated semantics the note says that instead, and says from which sentence. No value in this batch was taken from a search snippet, a blog or a mirror. LIBREOFFICE: probed on all four pinned builds (24.2.0.3, 24.8.7.2, 25.2.0.3, 25.8.7.3) in five storage spellings -- plain, _xlfn., COM.MICROSOFT., ORG.OPENOFFICE. and _xlfn.ORG.OPENOFFICE. -- and #NAME? under every one of them, so the expected values below describe Google Sheets and the LibreOffice column records absence.

Matched
=POW(2,5) The page's other literal Sample Usage line 32 32
Provenance

Derived from the same definition; the page publishes no results. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Matched
=POW(A2,B2) The page's cell-reference Sample Usage line 81 81
Provenance

Derived; cells chosen by this corpus, since the page names A2/B2 without populating them. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Matched
=POW(2,5)-POWER(2,5) The documented equivalence to POWER, asserted structurally 0 0
Provenance

A structural assertion with no derived constant. The page states "POW is equivalent to the POWER function." Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Matched
=POW(-3,3) The one constraint the page states, exercised on its permitted side -27 -27
Provenance

The `base` argument description is the page's only constraint: "If `base` is negative, `exponent` must be an integer." An integer exponent over a negative base is therefore the documented-legal case and -27 follows from the definition. The page names NO error value for the forbidden case (negative base, fractional exponent), so this corpus asserts nothing about it. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Matched

LibreOffice Calc 25.8.7.3 (tested 2026-09-01)

FormulaDescriptionResultExpectedVerdict
=POW(4,0.5) The page's own Sample Usage line with a fractional exponent #NAME? 2
Provenance

Google's Sample Usage prints POW(4,0.5) with no result; 2 is DERIVED from the page's definition, "Returns a number raised to a power", i.e. the positive square root of 4. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603. BATCH PROVENANCE (batch H, the first Sheets/LibreOffice-only batch). Every function in this batch has x == false in docs/data/compat.json: it is a Google Sheets function that Microsoft does not document at all, so this corpus makes NO claim about it in that engine and nothing here is measured against that vendor's documentation. The authority is Google's own support.google.com function page, cited by full URL and by the date it was read -- Google publishes no version number for these pages, so a bare URL dates nothing. WHAT GOOGLE ACTUALLY PRINTS, WHICH IS LESS THAN IT LOOKS: most of these pages carry a 'Sample Usage' block of FORMULAS WITH NO RESULTS. Where a value below is Google's own published output the note says so; where it is derived from the page's stated semantics the note says that instead, and says from which sentence. No value in this batch was taken from a search snippet, a blog or a mirror. LIBREOFFICE: probed on all four pinned builds (24.2.0.3, 24.8.7.2, 25.2.0.3, 25.8.7.3) in five storage spellings -- plain, _xlfn., COM.MICROSOFT., ORG.OPENOFFICE. and _xlfn.ORG.OPENOFFICE. -- and #NAME? under every one of them, so the expected values below describe Google Sheets and the LibreOffice column records absence.

Mismatch
=POW(2,5) The page's other literal Sample Usage line #NAME? 32
Provenance

Derived from the same definition; the page publishes no results. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Mismatch
=POW(A2,B2) The page's cell-reference Sample Usage line #NAME? 81
Provenance

Derived; cells chosen by this corpus, since the page names A2/B2 without populating them. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Mismatch
=POW(2,5)-POWER(2,5) The documented equivalence to POWER, asserted structurally #NAME? 0
Provenance

A structural assertion with no derived constant. The page states "POW is equivalent to the POWER function." Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Mismatch
=POW(-3,3) The one constraint the page states, exercised on its permitted side #NAME? -27
Provenance

The `base` argument description is the page's only constraint: "If `base` is negative, `exponent` must be an integer." An integer exponent over a negative base is therefore the documented-legal case and -27 follows from the definition. The page names NO error value for the forbidden case (negative base, fractional exponent), so this corpus asserts nothing about it. Google's POW page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093603.

Mismatch

Docs & syntax

Where POW behaves differently