CSCH

Quirk found

Category: Math and trigonometry · Last tested 2026-09-01

Real compatibility results for the CSCH function: executed in Excel for the web, Google Sheets and LibreOffice Calc, with desktop Excel behavior from Microsoft’s official documentation (we do not run desktop Excel — Excel for the web is a different application and is executed separately). Syntax and links to that documentation are below.

Support matrix

Engine	Documented	Live-tested	Verdict
Excel (desktop)	Yes	No — documented only	n/a
Excel for the web	—	Yes (recalc, 2026-09-01)	Quirk found
Google Sheets	Yes	Yes (Drive import, 2026-08-31)	Supported, behaves as documented
LibreOffice Calc	Yes	Yes (25.8.7.3, 2026-08-31)	Quirk found

LibreOffice version history

We executed the same test cases under each LibreOffice release to show exactly when CSCH’s support changed — not documentation claims, real results.

LibreOffice version	Verdict	Tested
24.2.0.3	Quirk found	2026-08-31
24.8.7.2	Quirk found	2026-08-31
25.2.0.3	Quirk found	2026-08-31
25.8.7.3	Quirk found	2026-08-31

Why isn't CSCH working in LibreOffice?

CSCH exists in LibreOffice 25.8.7.3, but it is not a drop-in match for Excel — our executed tests found real behavioral differences (detailed in the test results on this page). If a formula that works in Excel or Google Sheets misbehaves in LibreOffice, compare your usage against the failing cases above before assuming your data is wrong.

Discovered quirks

=CSCH(2^27) on Excel for the web returned 0, but the documented/expected result is #NUM!.
Provenance
Excel documents: "The absolute value of Number must be less than 2^27" and "If Number is outside its constraints, CSCH returns the #NUM! error value." 2^27 = 134217728 is exactly the excluded boundary. Mathematically csch(134217728) underflows to 0, so this case tests the documented range check rather than the arithmetic. EXECUTED RESULT: all four LibreOffice builds return 0 instead of the documented error, i.e. they answer the mathematics and ignore the range check; MISMATCH vs expected: expected '#NUM!', got 0
=CSCH(2^27) on LibreOffice Calc returned 0, but the documented/expected result is #NUM!.
Provenance
Excel documents: "The absolute value of Number must be less than 2^27" and "If Number is outside its constraints, CSCH returns the #NUM! error value." 2^27 = 134217728 is exactly the excluded boundary. Mathematically csch(134217728) underflows to 0, so this case tests the documented range check rather than the arithmetic. EXECUTED RESULT: all four LibreOffice builds return 0 instead of the documented error, i.e. they answer the mathematics and ignore the range check; MISMATCH vs expected: expected '#NUM!', got 0

Executed test cases

Excel for the web (executed 2026-09-01 via OneDrive recalculation)

These values come from Excel for the web, not from desktop Excel. They are two different implementations of the calculation engine, and this run measured only the web one: the corpus was uploaded to OneDrive as .xlsx, recalculated by Excel for the web on open, and downloaded again for readback. Excel for the web is a rolling service with no pinnable version, so the run is identified by its date. Where a value here disagrees with the Expected column — which is Microsoft’s documentation of the desktop product — we cannot tell you whether the web engine diverges from the desktop one or the documentation is wrong about both, because we do not run desktop Excel.

Formula	Description	Result	Expected	Verdict
=ROUND(CSCH(1.5),9)	Microsoft's documented worked example: the hyperbolic cosecant of 1.5	0.469642441	0.469642441 Provenance Microsoft's page publishes this example's result to four decimals as 0.4696. Independently derived from csch(x) = 1/sinh(x) = 2/(e^x - e^-x): 1/math.sinh(1.5) = 0.46964244059522464 -> 0.469642441 at 9 dp, agreeing with the published 0.4696	Matched
=ROUND(CSCH(-1.5),9)	The hyperbolic cosecant of -1.5, which must be the negative of that of +1.5	-0.469642441	-0.469642441 Provenance sinh is odd, so csch = 1/sinh is odd as well: CSCH(-1.5) must be exactly -CSCH(1.5). Verified independently: 1/math.sinh(-1.5) = -0.46964244059522464	Matched
=CSCH(2^27)	An argument at the documented magnitude limit of 2^27	0	#NUM! Provenance Excel documents: "The absolute value of Number must be less than 2^27" and "If Number is outside its constraints, CSCH returns the #NUM! error value." 2^27 = 134217728 is exactly the excluded boundary. Mathematically csch(134217728) underflows to 0, so this case tests the documented range check rather than the arithmetic. EXECUTED RESULT: all four LibreOffice builds return 0 instead of the documented error, i.e. they answer the mathematics and ignore the range check	Mismatch
=CSCH("abc")	A non-numeric argument	#VALUE!	#VALUE! Provenance Excel documents: "If Number is a non-numeric value, CSCH returns the #VALUE! error value."	Matched

Google Sheets (executed 2026-08-31 via Drive import)

Google Sheets is a rolling service with no pinnable version, so this run is identified by its date. The corpus was imported to Drive as .xlsx, recalculated by Sheets, and exported back for readback.

Formula	Description	Result	Expected	Verdict
=ROUND(CSCH(1.5),9)	Microsoft's documented worked example: the hyperbolic cosecant of 1.5	0.469642441	0.469642441 Provenance Microsoft's page publishes this example's result to four decimals as 0.4696. Independently derived from csch(x) = 1/sinh(x) = 2/(e^x - e^-x): 1/math.sinh(1.5) = 0.46964244059522464 -> 0.469642441 at 9 dp, agreeing with the published 0.4696	Matched
=ROUND(CSCH(-1.5),9)	The hyperbolic cosecant of -1.5, which must be the negative of that of +1.5	-0.469642441	-0.469642441 Provenance sinh is odd, so csch = 1/sinh is odd as well: CSCH(-1.5) must be exactly -CSCH(1.5). Verified independently: 1/math.sinh(-1.5) = -0.46964244059522464	Matched
=CSCH(2^27)	An argument at the documented magnitude limit of 2^27	#NUM!	#NUM! Provenance Excel documents: "The absolute value of Number must be less than 2^27" and "If Number is outside its constraints, CSCH returns the #NUM! error value." 2^27 = 134217728 is exactly the excluded boundary. Mathematically csch(134217728) underflows to 0, so this case tests the documented range check rather than the arithmetic. EXECUTED RESULT: all four LibreOffice builds return 0 instead of the documented error, i.e. they answer the mathematics and ignore the range check	Matched
=CSCH("abc")	A non-numeric argument	#VALUE!	#VALUE! Provenance Excel documents: "If Number is a non-numeric value, CSCH returns the #VALUE! error value."	Matched

LibreOffice Calc 25.8.7.3 (tested 2026-08-31)

Formula	Description	Result	Expected	Verdict
=ROUND(CSCH(1.5),9)	Microsoft's documented worked example: the hyperbolic cosecant of 1.5	0.469642441	0.469642441 Provenance Microsoft's page publishes this example's result to four decimals as 0.4696. Independently derived from csch(x) = 1/sinh(x) = 2/(e^x - e^-x): 1/math.sinh(1.5) = 0.46964244059522464 -> 0.469642441 at 9 dp, agreeing with the published 0.4696	Matched
=ROUND(CSCH(-1.5),9)	The hyperbolic cosecant of -1.5, which must be the negative of that of +1.5	-0.469642441	-0.469642441 Provenance sinh is odd, so csch = 1/sinh is odd as well: CSCH(-1.5) must be exactly -CSCH(1.5). Verified independently: 1/math.sinh(-1.5) = -0.46964244059522464	Matched
=CSCH(2^27)	An argument at the documented magnitude limit of 2^27	0	#NUM! Provenance Excel documents: "The absolute value of Number must be less than 2^27" and "If Number is outside its constraints, CSCH returns the #NUM! error value." 2^27 = 134217728 is exactly the excluded boundary. Mathematically csch(134217728) underflows to 0, so this case tests the documented range check rather than the arithmetic. EXECUTED RESULT: all four LibreOffice builds return 0 instead of the documented error, i.e. they answer the mathematics and ignore the range check	Mismatch
=CSCH("abc")	A non-numeric argument	#VALUE!	#VALUE! Provenance Excel documents: "If Number is a non-numeric value, CSCH returns the #VALUE! error value."	Matched

Docs & syntax

Excel (desktop): official documentation
Google Sheets: official documentation
LibreOffice Calc: official documentation

Where CSCH behaves differently

Your function exists but your file cannot say so: _xlfn storage tokens
Executed: eight IM* functions LibreOffice implements return #NAME? on all four builds because it cannot read Excel's _xlfn. token for them, while COT and CSC only work under that same prefix. Eleven LibreOffice aliases are erased by its own exporter, and a token change between 24.2 and 24.8 makes a 24.8-written file open as #NAME? in 24.2.