← All functions

CONCAT

Quirk found

Category: Text · Last tested 2026-09-01

Real compatibility results for the CONCAT function: executed in Excel for the web, Google Sheets and LibreOffice Calc, with desktop Excel behavior from Microsoft’s official documentation (we do not run desktop Excel — Excel for the web is a different application and is executed separately). Syntax and links to that documentation are below.

Support matrix

EngineDocumentedLive-testedVerdict
Excel (desktop)Yes No — documented only n/a
Excel for the web— Yes (recalc, 2026-09-01) Supported, behaves as documented
Google SheetsYes Yes (Drive import, 2026-08-29) Quirk found
LibreOffice CalcYes Yes (25.8.7.3, 2026-07-29) Supported, behaves as documented

LibreOffice version history

We executed the same test cases under each LibreOffice release to show exactly when CONCAT’s support changed — not documentation claims, real results.

LibreOffice versionVerdictTested
24.2.0.3 Supported, behaves as documented 2026-08-29
24.8.7.2 Supported, behaves as documented 2026-08-29
25.2.0.3 Supported, behaves as documented 2026-08-29
25.8.7.3 Supported, behaves as documented 2026-07-29

Why isn’t CONCAT working in Google Sheets?

CONCAT runs in Google Sheets, but our executed cases show it does not match Excel’s documented behavior on every input (the failing cases are listed on this page). If a formula that behaves one way in Excel gives you a different answer in Sheets, compare your usage against those cases before assuming your data is wrong.

Discovered quirks

Executed test cases

Excel for the web (executed 2026-09-01 via OneDrive recalculation)

These values come from Excel for the web, not from desktop Excel. They are two different implementations of the calculation engine, and this run measured only the web one: the corpus was uploaded to OneDrive as .xlsx, recalculated by Excel for the web on open, and downloaded again for readback. Excel for the web is a rolling service with no pinnable version, so the run is identified by its date. Where a value here disagrees with the Expected column — which is Microsoft’s documentation of the desktop product — we cannot tell you whether the web engine diverges from the desktop one or the documentation is wrong about both, because we do not run desktop Excel.

FormulaDescriptionResultExpectedVerdict
=CONCAT("a","b","c") Basic literal concatenation abc abc Matched
=CONCAT(A1:A3) CONCAT flattens a range directly (unlike CONCATENATE, which cannot take a range) xyz xyz Matched
=CONCAT("val:",5) Numbers are coerced to text without an explicit TEXT() call val:5 val:5 Matched
=CONCAT(A1:B2) 2-D range is flattened row-major abcd abcd Matched

Google Sheets (executed 2026-08-29 via Drive import)

Google Sheets is a rolling service with no pinnable version, so this run is identified by its date. The corpus was imported to Drive as .xlsx, recalculated by Sheets, and exported back for readback.

FormulaDescriptionResultExpectedVerdict
=CONCAT("a","b","c") Basic literal concatenation #N/A abc Mismatch
=CONCAT(A1:A3) CONCAT flattens a range directly (unlike CONCATENATE, which cannot take a range) #N/A xyz Mismatch
=CONCAT("val:",5) Numbers are coerced to text without an explicit TEXT() call val:5 val:5 Matched
=CONCAT(A1:B2) 2-D range is flattened row-major #N/A abcd Mismatch

LibreOffice Calc 25.8.7.3 (tested 2026-07-29)

FormulaDescriptionResultExpectedVerdict
=CONCAT("a","b","c") Basic literal concatenation abc abc Matched
=CONCAT(A1:A3) CONCAT flattens a range directly (unlike CONCATENATE, which cannot take a range) xyz xyz Matched
=CONCAT("val:",5) Numbers are coerced to text without an explicit TEXT() call val:5 val:5 Matched
=CONCAT(A1:B2) 2-D range is flattened row-major abcd abcd Matched

Docs & syntax

Where CONCAT behaves differently

Compared against other functions