AI

NOT ASSERTABLE BY DESIGN, and deliberately recorded as a probe (expected: null) rather than a support claim -- the treatment batch B gave the CUBE* family and COPILOT, batch C gave DETECTLANGUAGE, and batch G gave RTD, STOCKHISTORY and TRANSLATE. Google's page publishes the syntax `AI("prompt",[optional range])` and the example `=AI("Generate slogan for event in 10 words or less", A2)`, which is the formula this case runs verbatim. THE VALUE IS GENERATED TEXT, NOT A COMPUTED FUNCTION OF THE ARGUMENTS. Google gates the feature -- "This feature requires an eligible Google Workspace or Google AI plan." -- and rations it -- "The AI function has short term and long term generation limits." -- and the page's own capability list includes "Access real-time information from Google Search", so an answer may depend on the live web at the moment of evaluation. WHAT GOOGLE DOES NOT SAY, SAID PLAINLY: this page carries no sentence promising that the output varies between runs, so no determinism disclaimer is attributed to Google here. The unassertability is INFERRED from the generative framing and the real-time-search capability quoted above, and is labelled as inference rather than dressed up as documentation. LIBREOFFICE, MEASURED BEFORE THIS FILE WAS AUTHORED. All four pinned builds (24.2.0.3, 24.8.7.2, 25.2.0.3, 25.8.7.3) were probed with NINE storage spellings -- plain, _xlfn., COM.MICROSOFT., ORG.OPENOFFICE., _xlfn.ORG.OPENOFFICE., ORG.LIBREOFFICE., _xlfn.ORG.LIBREOFFICE., _xlfn.COM.MICROSOFT. and COM.SUN.STAR.SHEET.ADDIN.ANALYSIS. -- and every one of those 36 combinations returned #NAME?. LibreOffice's own parser additionally wrote the name back into the converted file LOWER-CASED ('=ai("Say hello")'), which is what it does with an identifier it does not recognise as a function at all rather than with a function it knows under a different storage token. A #NAME? under all nine storage forms on all four builds is therefore a genuine absence and not a storage-form artifact of this harness, which is why 'unsupported in LibreOffice' IS a verdict this file publishes even though the returned VALUE is not assertable in any engine. BATCH PROVENANCE (batch J, group B of sheets-lo-only-plan.md -- Google-documented, service- or context-bound; the final batch of the completeness push). This function has x == false in docs/data/compat.json: Microsoft does not document it at all, so this corpus makes no claim about Excel, nothing here is measured against Microsoft's documentation, and the Excel column on the published page reads 'n/a (not an Excel function)' rather than a verdict. The authority is Google's own function help, cited by full URL and by the date it was read (2026-08-31) -- Google publishes no version number for Sheets, so a bare URL dates nothing. GOOGLE SHEETS: this batch builds the Sheets chunk whose ingest will record what the service returns for this call. Until that ingest lands the Sheets column on the published page reads 'Not yet' and nothing in this file claims anything about it. (Stated positively on purpose -- scripts/check_honesty.py bans the blanket negative shape of that sentence, and the guard is worth keeping blunt.) Google's AI function help page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/15877199.

NOT ASSERTABLE BY DESIGN, and deliberately recorded as a probe (expected: null) rather than a support claim -- the treatment batch B gave the CUBE* family and COPILOT, batch C gave DETECTLANGUAGE, and batch G gave RTD, STOCKHISTORY and TRANSLATE. Google's page publishes the syntax `AI("prompt",[optional range])` and the example `=AI("Generate slogan for event in 10 words or less", A2)`, which is the formula this case runs verbatim. THE VALUE IS GENERATED TEXT, NOT A COMPUTED FUNCTION OF THE ARGUMENTS. Google gates the feature -- "This feature requires an eligible Google Workspace or Google AI plan." -- and rations it -- "The AI function has short term and long term generation limits." -- and the page's own capability list includes "Access real-time information from Google Search", so an answer may depend on the live web at the moment of evaluation. WHAT GOOGLE DOES NOT SAY, SAID PLAINLY: this page carries no sentence promising that the output varies between runs, so no determinism disclaimer is attributed to Google here. The unassertability is INFERRED from the generative framing and the real-time-search capability quoted above, and is labelled as inference rather than dressed up as documentation. LIBREOFFICE, MEASURED BEFORE THIS FILE WAS AUTHORED. All four pinned builds (24.2.0.3, 24.8.7.2, 25.2.0.3, 25.8.7.3) were probed with NINE storage spellings -- plain, _xlfn., COM.MICROSOFT., ORG.OPENOFFICE., _xlfn.ORG.OPENOFFICE., ORG.LIBREOFFICE., _xlfn.ORG.LIBREOFFICE., _xlfn.COM.MICROSOFT. and COM.SUN.STAR.SHEET.ADDIN.ANALYSIS. -- and every one of those 36 combinations returned #NAME?. LibreOffice's own parser additionally wrote the name back into the converted file LOWER-CASED ('=ai("Say hello")'), which is what it does with an identifier it does not recognise as a function at all rather than with a function it knows under a different storage token. A #NAME? under all nine storage forms on all four builds is therefore a genuine absence and not a storage-form artifact of this harness, which is why 'unsupported in LibreOffice' IS a verdict this file publishes even though the returned VALUE is not assertable in any engine. BATCH PROVENANCE (batch J, group B of sheets-lo-only-plan.md -- Google-documented, service- or context-bound; the final batch of the completeness push). This function has x == false in docs/data/compat.json: Microsoft does not document it at all, so this corpus makes no claim about Excel, nothing here is measured against Microsoft's documentation, and the Excel column on the published page reads 'n/a (not an Excel function)' rather than a verdict. The authority is Google's own function help, cited by full URL and by the date it was read (2026-08-31) -- Google publishes no version number for Sheets, so a bare URL dates nothing. GOOGLE SHEETS: this batch builds the Sheets chunk whose ingest will record what the service returns for this call. Until that ingest lands the Sheets column on the published page reads 'Not yet' and nothing in this file claims anything about it. (Stated positively on purpose -- scripts/check_honesty.py bans the blanket negative shape of that sentence, and the guard is worth keeping blunt.) Google's AI function help page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/15877199.

NOT ASSERTABLE BY DESIGN, and deliberately recorded as a probe (expected: null) rather than a support claim -- the treatment batch B gave the CUBE* family and COPILOT, batch C gave DETECTLANGUAGE, and batch G gave RTD, STOCKHISTORY and TRANSLATE. Google's page publishes the syntax `AI("prompt",[optional range])` and the example `=AI("Generate slogan for event in 10 words or less", A2)`, which is the formula this case runs verbatim. THE VALUE IS GENERATED TEXT, NOT A COMPUTED FUNCTION OF THE ARGUMENTS. Google gates the feature -- "This feature requires an eligible Google Workspace or Google AI plan." -- and rations it -- "The AI function has short term and long term generation limits." -- and the page's own capability list includes "Access real-time information from Google Search", so an answer may depend on the live web at the moment of evaluation. WHAT GOOGLE DOES NOT SAY, SAID PLAINLY: this page carries no sentence promising that the output varies between runs, so no determinism disclaimer is attributed to Google here. The unassertability is INFERRED from the generative framing and the real-time-search capability quoted above, and is labelled as inference rather than dressed up as documentation. LIBREOFFICE, MEASURED BEFORE THIS FILE WAS AUTHORED. All four pinned builds (24.2.0.3, 24.8.7.2, 25.2.0.3, 25.8.7.3) were probed with NINE storage spellings -- plain, _xlfn., COM.MICROSOFT., ORG.OPENOFFICE., _xlfn.ORG.OPENOFFICE., ORG.LIBREOFFICE., _xlfn.ORG.LIBREOFFICE., _xlfn.COM.MICROSOFT. and COM.SUN.STAR.SHEET.ADDIN.ANALYSIS. -- and every one of those 36 combinations returned #NAME?. LibreOffice's own parser additionally wrote the name back into the converted file LOWER-CASED ('=ai("Say hello")'), which is what it does with an identifier it does not recognise as a function at all rather than with a function it knows under a different storage token. A #NAME? under all nine storage forms on all four builds is therefore a genuine absence and not a storage-form artifact of this harness, which is why 'unsupported in LibreOffice' IS a verdict this file publishes even though the returned VALUE is not assertable in any engine. BATCH PROVENANCE (batch J, group B of sheets-lo-only-plan.md -- Google-documented, service- or context-bound; the final batch of the completeness push). This function has x == false in docs/data/compat.json: Microsoft does not document it at all, so this corpus makes no claim about Excel, nothing here is measured against Microsoft's documentation, and the Excel column on the published page reads 'n/a (not an Excel function)' rather than a verdict. The authority is Google's own function help, cited by full URL and by the date it was read (2026-08-31) -- Google publishes no version number for Sheets, so a bare URL dates nothing. GOOGLE SHEETS: this batch builds the Sheets chunk whose ingest will record what the service returns for this call. Until that ingest lands the Sheets column on the published page reads 'Not yet' and nothing in this file claims anything about it. (Stated positively on purpose -- scripts/check_honesty.py bans the blanket negative shape of that sentence, and the guard is worth keeping blunt.) Google's AI function help page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/15877199.