ADD

Google's Sample Usage prints the formula ADD(3,4) AND NOTHING ELSE -- there is no result column on this page, so 7 is DERIVED, not quoted, from the page's one-line definition: "Returns the sum of two numbers. Equivalent to the `+` operator." Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590. BATCH PROVENANCE (batch H, the first Sheets/LibreOffice-only batch). Every function in this batch has x == false in docs/data/compat.json: it is a Google Sheets function that Microsoft does not document at all, so this corpus makes NO claim about it in that engine and nothing here is measured against that vendor's documentation. The authority is Google's own support.google.com function page, cited by full URL and by the date it was read -- Google publishes no version number for these pages, so a bare URL dates nothing. WHAT GOOGLE ACTUALLY PRINTS, WHICH IS LESS THAN IT LOOKS: most of these pages carry a 'Sample Usage' block of FORMULAS WITH NO RESULTS. Where a value below is Google's own published output the note says so; where it is derived from the page's stated semantics the note says that instead, and says from which sentence. No value in this batch was taken from a search snippet, a blog or a mirror. LIBREOFFICE: probed on all four pinned builds (24.2.0.3, 24.8.7.2, 25.2.0.3, 25.8.7.3) in five storage spellings -- plain, _xlfn., COM.MICROSOFT., ORG.OPENOFFICE. and _xlfn.ORG.OPENOFFICE. -- and #NAME? under every one of them, so the expected values below describe Google Sheets and the LibreOffice column records absence.

The second Sample Usage line, ADD(A2,A3), with cells this corpus chose; 42 is derived from the "+ operator" equivalence, not published. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

A structural assertion with no derived constant. The page defines ADD as "Equivalent to the `+` operator", so the difference between the two spellings must be exactly zero whatever the engine computes. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

Derived from the same one-line definition; the page publishes no example with negative or fractional arguments at all. ROUND-wrapped so binary floating point cannot decide the case. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

The Notes bullet reads: "Unlike SUM, ADD only supports the addition of two scalar values and takes neither ranges nor more than two arguments." The DIFFERENCE it draws is about what each accepts, not about what they compute, so on two scalars the two must agree. The page names no error value for the range/three-argument cases it excludes, so this corpus asserts nothing about them. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

Google's Sample Usage prints the formula ADD(3,4) AND NOTHING ELSE -- there is no result column on this page, so 7 is DERIVED, not quoted, from the page's one-line definition: "Returns the sum of two numbers. Equivalent to the `+` operator." Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590. BATCH PROVENANCE (batch H, the first Sheets/LibreOffice-only batch). Every function in this batch has x == false in docs/data/compat.json: it is a Google Sheets function that Microsoft does not document at all, so this corpus makes NO claim about it in that engine and nothing here is measured against that vendor's documentation. The authority is Google's own support.google.com function page, cited by full URL and by the date it was read -- Google publishes no version number for these pages, so a bare URL dates nothing. WHAT GOOGLE ACTUALLY PRINTS, WHICH IS LESS THAN IT LOOKS: most of these pages carry a 'Sample Usage' block of FORMULAS WITH NO RESULTS. Where a value below is Google's own published output the note says so; where it is derived from the page's stated semantics the note says that instead, and says from which sentence. No value in this batch was taken from a search snippet, a blog or a mirror. LIBREOFFICE: probed on all four pinned builds (24.2.0.3, 24.8.7.2, 25.2.0.3, 25.8.7.3) in five storage spellings -- plain, _xlfn., COM.MICROSOFT., ORG.OPENOFFICE. and _xlfn.ORG.OPENOFFICE. -- and #NAME? under every one of them, so the expected values below describe Google Sheets and the LibreOffice column records absence.

The second Sample Usage line, ADD(A2,A3), with cells this corpus chose; 42 is derived from the "+ operator" equivalence, not published. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

A structural assertion with no derived constant. The page defines ADD as "Equivalent to the `+` operator", so the difference between the two spellings must be exactly zero whatever the engine computes. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

Derived from the same one-line definition; the page publishes no example with negative or fractional arguments at all. ROUND-wrapped so binary floating point cannot decide the case. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

The Notes bullet reads: "Unlike SUM, ADD only supports the addition of two scalar values and takes neither ranges nor more than two arguments." The DIFFERENCE it draws is about what each accepts, not about what they compute, so on two scalars the two must agree. The page names no error value for the range/three-argument cases it excludes, so this corpus asserts nothing about them. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

Google's Sample Usage prints the formula ADD(3,4) AND NOTHING ELSE -- there is no result column on this page, so 7 is DERIVED, not quoted, from the page's one-line definition: "Returns the sum of two numbers. Equivalent to the `+` operator." Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590. BATCH PROVENANCE (batch H, the first Sheets/LibreOffice-only batch). Every function in this batch has x == false in docs/data/compat.json: it is a Google Sheets function that Microsoft does not document at all, so this corpus makes NO claim about it in that engine and nothing here is measured against that vendor's documentation. The authority is Google's own support.google.com function page, cited by full URL and by the date it was read -- Google publishes no version number for these pages, so a bare URL dates nothing. WHAT GOOGLE ACTUALLY PRINTS, WHICH IS LESS THAN IT LOOKS: most of these pages carry a 'Sample Usage' block of FORMULAS WITH NO RESULTS. Where a value below is Google's own published output the note says so; where it is derived from the page's stated semantics the note says that instead, and says from which sentence. No value in this batch was taken from a search snippet, a blog or a mirror. LIBREOFFICE: probed on all four pinned builds (24.2.0.3, 24.8.7.2, 25.2.0.3, 25.8.7.3) in five storage spellings -- plain, _xlfn., COM.MICROSOFT., ORG.OPENOFFICE. and _xlfn.ORG.OPENOFFICE. -- and #NAME? under every one of them, so the expected values below describe Google Sheets and the LibreOffice column records absence.

The second Sample Usage line, ADD(A2,A3), with cells this corpus chose; 42 is derived from the "+ operator" equivalence, not published. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

A structural assertion with no derived constant. The page defines ADD as "Equivalent to the `+` operator", so the difference between the two spellings must be exactly zero whatever the engine computes. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

Derived from the same one-line definition; the page publishes no example with negative or fractional arguments at all. ROUND-wrapped so binary floating point cannot decide the case. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.

The Notes bullet reads: "Unlike SUM, ADD only supports the addition of two scalar values and takes neither ranges nor more than two arguments." The DIFFERENCE it draws is about what each accepts, not about what they compute, so on two scalars the two must agree. The page names no error value for the range/three-argument cases it excludes, so this corpus asserts nothing about them. Google's ADD page, read live on 2026-08-31 at https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3093590.